Test the Martingale system yourself, before you trust it.

Doubling your bet after every loss feels like it should "guarantee" a win eventually. It doesn't remove the edge — it just trades a high chance of small wins for a small chance of a bankroll-ending loss streak. Set your own numbers below and run a thousand simulated sessions to see the trade-off for real.

Martingale · 1,000-session simulator
Starting bankroll
credits
Base bet
credits
Cash-out target
×
Rounds per session

Simulated instantly in your browser. No real bets, no data sent anywhere.

Set your numbers and run the simulation to see how it actually plays out.

01 / Why doubling doesn't beat the edge

Every single bet still has the same edge.

Martingale doesn't change the win chance or payout of any individual bet — each one is still exactly RTP ÷ target to win, worth (RTP − 1) × bet in expectation. Stacking a sequence of −EV bets together, however you size them, can't average out to a positive number. What changes is the shape of your outcomes: instead of many small losses, you get long streaks of tiny +1-base-bet wins, punctuated by rare but catastrophic bankroll wipeouts when a losing streak runs longer than your bankroll — or the table's own max bet — is able to absorb.

Worked example — 2× target, doubling after every loss
Win chance per bet, RTP ÷ 249.50%
Loss chance per bet50.50%
Chance of 5 losses in a row3.28%
Chance of 8 losses in a row0.42%
Chance of 10 losses in a row0.11%
Chance of 15 losses in a row0.0035%

A 15-loss streak needs a base bet doubled 15 times — 32,768× the starting bet just to keep the system alive. No realistic bankroll survives many of those before hitting one.

03 / Platform guides

Same math, platform by platform.